loader image

Below table gives a high level comparison among various Scaling models available for scaling Scrum. Choose the best suitable scaling model as per your need.

Feature / Framework

SAFe (Scaled Agile Framework)

LeSS (Large-Scale Scrum)

Scrum@Scale

Nexus

Disciplined Agile Delivery (DAD)

Spotify Model

Focus

Enterprise-wide agility

Scaling Scrum with minimal changes

Scaling Scrum while keeping decentralization

Extending Scrum with minimal overhead

Hybrid Agile framework covering full delivery lifecycle

Organizational culture & squads

Number of Teams

5+ teams up to entire enterprise

2-8 teams per Product

Unlimited teams

3-9 teams per Nexus

Can scale to enterprise level

Flexible, depends on tribes/squads

Structure

Defined roles, ARTs (Agile Release Trains)

Minimal additional roles

Loosely defined leadership meta-Scrum

Nexus Integration Team

Multi-layered with different Agile frameworks

Squads, Tribes, Guilds, and Chapters

Roles Introduced

RTE (Release Train Engineer), SPC (SAFe Program Consultant), Solution Train Engineer

No new major roles

Meta-Scrum Master, Executive Action Team

Nexus Integration Team

Enterprise Architect, Program Manager, etc.

No new formal roles beyond squads & tribes

Planning Approach

PI (Program Increment) Planning every 8-12 weeks

Sprint-based planning

Modular approach to planning

Sprint Planning at Nexus level

Combination of Agile, Lean, and Program Planning

Autonomous teams with informal coordination

Governance Model

Centralized governance

Decentralized with minimal overhead

Distributed decision-making

Lightweight integration-focused

Balanced between Agile and governance

Informal leadership through squads

Dependency Management

Features cross-team sync mechanisms

Encourages teams to self-manage dependencies

Uses Scrum-of-Scrums and Executive Meta-Scrum

Nexus Daily Scrum for integration

Combination of Lean, Agile, and Enterprise governance

Encourages informal alignment and communication

Best For

Large enterprises with hierarchical structures

Organizations wanting to scale Scrum with minimal changes

Organizations that need flexibility while scaling

Companies already using Scrum wanting a simple extension

Enterprises needing a tailored Agile approach

Companies focused on innovation-driven Agile culture

Pros

Comprehensive, structured, and enterprise-ready

Simple and lightweight

Modular, easy to adapt

Keeps Scrum principles intact

Customizable, adaptable

Culture-driven and autonomous

Cons

Heavy on processes and documentation

Requires strong Product Ownership

Can become complex if not managed well

Limited to Scrum teams only

Can be overwhelming for newcomers

Requires strong culture for success


Attend Learnovative’s CSM course in Hyderabad to get fundamental understanding of Scrum and Agile and then attend ACSM course online in Hyderabad to deepen your understanding about Scaling Scrum and the role of Scrum Master in a Scaling environment.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

We will get back to you shortly

Request a Callback